General
Sam Cohen et al., Copartners, Respondents, v. Sam Rutta et al., Individually and as Copartners, Appellants, et al., Defendants
271 A.D.2d 794·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1946·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Sam Cohen et al., Copartners, Respondents, v. Sam Rutta et al., Individually and as Copartners, Appellants, et al., Defendants.
[MAJORITY]
Appeal from an order granting plaintiffs’ motion for an examination before trial of the defendants Rutta. Order, insofar as appealed from, affirmed, with $10 costs and disbursements. Ho opinion. Lewis, P. J., Hagarty, Carswell, Johnston and Adel, JJ., concur.