Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers' Association et al. v. Range et al., 1957 — 355 U.S. 813 · caselaw · US
General
Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers' Association et al. v. Range et al.
355 U.S. 813·Supreme Court of the United States·1957
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 115.
Tennessee Burley Tobacco Growers’ Association et al. v. Range et al.
Norman M. Littell and Frederick Bernays Wiener for petitioners. F. H. Parvin for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Court of Appeals of Tennessee, Eastern Division. Certiorari denied.
By invitation of the Court to express his views, 353 U. S. 981, Solicitor General Rankin filed memoranda for the United States, as amicus curiae, in opposition to the petition.