General
The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers' Investment Company et al.
207 U.S. 580·Supreme Court of the United States·1907
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 358.
The Blythe Company, Plaintiff in Error, v. Bankers’ Investment Company et al.
In error to the Supreme Court of the State of California.
Motions to dismiss or affirm submitted October 21, 1907.
Decided October 28, 1907.
Mr. George W. Towle for plaintiff in error. Mr. Frederic D. McKenney, Mr. E. S. Heller and Mr. Thomas 7. Bergin for defendants in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for the want of jurisdiction. Blythe v. Hinckley, 84 Fed. Rep. 228; Blythe Company v. Blythe, 172 U. S. 644; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 111 Fed. Rep. 827; Blythe Company v. Hinckley, 184 U. S. 701; Blythe v. Hinckley, 180 U. S. 333; Dupaneur v. Rochereau, 21 Wall. 130; Metcalf v. Watertown, 153 U. S. 671; Blythe Company v. Bankers’ Investment Company, 147 California, 82; Missouri Pacific Railway v. Fitzgerald, 160 U. S. 558, 582; Temple v. Hagar, 4 Wall. 432, 434.