Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
FIRST NAT. BANK OF PITTSBURGH v. ANGLO-OESTERREICHISCHE BANK, for Use of ANGLO-AUSTRIAN BANK, Limited, for Use of GROUF, 1930 — 37 F.2d 564 · caselaw · US
General
FIRST NAT. BANK OF PITTSBURGH v. ANGLO-OESTERREICHISCHE BANK, for Use of ANGLO-AUSTRIAN BANK, Limited, for Use of GROUF
37 F.2d 564·United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit·1930
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
FIRST NAT. BANK OF PITTSBURGH v. ANGLO-OESTERREICHISCHE BANK, for Use of ANGLO-AUSTRIAN BANK, Limited, for Use of GROUF.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Third Circuit.
January 16, 1930.
No. 4220.
Gifford K. Wright and George E. Alter, both of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Alter, Wright &> Barron, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellant.
Patterson Crawford, Arensberg & Dunn, of Pittsburgh, Pa. (Samuel R. Waehtell, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.
Before WOOLLEY and DAVIS, Circuit Judges, and MORRIS, District Judge.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Affirmed on the findings and reasoning of Judge Thomson’s opinion.