Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles H. Stecker, Respondent, v. Weaver Coal and Coke Company, Appellant, 1908 — 192 N.Y. 556 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Charles H. Stecker, Respondent, v. Weaver Coal and Coke Company, Appellant
192 N.Y. 556·New York Court of Appeals·1908·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles H. Stecker, Respondent, v. Weaver Coal and Coke Company, Appellant.
Stecker v. Weaver Coal & Coke Co., 116 App. Div. 772, affirmed.
(Argued April 20, 1908;
decided May 19, 1908.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered January 22, 1907, modifying and affirming as modified a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirming an order denying a motion for a new trial in an action to recover for an alleged breach of contract.
Joseph A. Arnold for appellant.
Alfred B. Nathan and Woodson R. Oglesby for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: Cullen, Ch. J., Gray, Vann, Werner, Willard Bartlett, Hiscock and Chase, JJ.