General
Rochester Printing Company, Respondent, v. Augustus B. Kellogg et al., Appellants
137 N.Y. 555·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Rochester Printing Company, Respondent, v. Augustus B. Kellogg et al., Appellants.
(Argued January 18, 1893;
decided February 7, 1893.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 22, 1892, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of a referee.
George W. Cothran for appellants.
Quincy Van Voorhis for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.