General

Samuel E. Hill et al. v. Richard F. Gereg

5 Conn. App. 464·Connecticut Appellate Court·1985·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Samuel E. Hill et al. v. Richard F. Gereg (3563) Borden, Spallone and Satter, Js. Argued September 19 decision released November 12, 1985 James B. Mason, with whom, on the brief, was Richard F. Gereg, for the appellant (defendant). Barbara J. Wardenburg, with whom, on the brief, was Samuel M. Chambliss, for the appellees (plaintiffs). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The defendant appeals from the denial of his motion to open a default judgment rendered against him. This case is controlled by Clapper v. Clapper, 3 Conn. App. 637, 490 A.2d 1030 (1985). There is no error.