General
F. A. Hooper et al. v. W. S. Kingsbury, as Surveyor General and Ex Officio Register of the State Land Office of the State of California
248 U.S. 544·Supreme Court of the United States·1919
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 97.
F. A. Hooper et al. v. W. S. Kingsbury, as Surveyor General and Ex Officio Register of the State Land Office of the State of California.
Error to the District Court of Appeal, First Appellate District, of the State of California.
Submitted December 17, 1918.
Decided January 7, 1919.
Mr. Charles C. Boynton and Mr. Robert T. Devlin for plaintiffs in error. Mr. U. S. Webb for defendant in error.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of (1)' Messenger v. Kingsbury, 158 California, 611; People v. California Fish Co., 166 California, 576; People v. Banning Co., 166 California, 635. (2) Equitable Life Assurance Society v. Brown, 187 U. S. 308, 314; Consolidated Turnpike Co. v. Norfolk &c. Ry. Co., 228 U. S. 596, 600; Manhattan Life Ins. Co. v. Cohen, 234 U. S. 123, 137. (3) Campbell v. Wade, 132 U. S. 34; Gonzales v. French, 164 U. S. 338, 345; Banning Co. v. California, 240 U. S. 142, 154.