Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
United States v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc. et al., 1949 — 338 U.S. 897 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
United States v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc. et al.
338 U.S. 897·Supreme Court of the United States·1949
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
December 12, 1949.
Per Curiam Decisions.
No. 334.
United States v. Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc. et al.
Solicitor General Perlman argued the cause for the United States. With him on the brief were Robert L. Stern, Ed Dupree, Hugo V. Prucha and Nathan Siegel. Mayer Goldberg and George S. Stansell argued the cause for appellees. Mr. Goldberg also filed a brief for the Shoreline Cooperative Apartments, Inc. et al., appellees. Kenart M. Rahn was with Mr. Stansell on the brief for Lumsden et al., appellees.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of the cases in which orders or judgments were this day announced.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The judgment is reversed. Woods v. Miller Co., 333 U. S. 138.