Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Walter E. CARR, District Director of Immigration, District No. 31, Appellant, v. KATSUJI SHIDARA, Appellee, 1933 — 63 F.2d 997 · caselaw · US
General
Walter E. CARR, District Director of Immigration, District No. 31, Appellant, v. KATSUJI SHIDARA, Appellee
63 F.2d 997·United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Walter E. CARR, District Director of Immigration, District No. 31, Appellant, v. KATSUJI SHIDARA, Appellee.
No. 7100.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.
March 6, 1933.
Samuel W. McNabb, U. S. Atty., and Ignatius F. Parker, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellant.
J. Edward Keating and Theodore E. Bowen, both of Los Angeles, Cal., for appellee.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Upon stipulation of counsel, confessing error of the District Court in view of the opinion of the Supreme Court of the United States in U. S. A. ex rel. Leo Stapf v. Corsi, 287 U. S. 129, 53 S. Ct. 40, 77 L. Ed.-, and that the said order may he reversed and cause remanded, with directions to deport appellee, ordered order of District Court herein reversed, and cause remanded, with directions to remand appellee to immigration authorities for deportation.