Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McIntire et al. v. Wm. Penn Broadcasting Co., 1946 — 327 U.S. 779 · caselaw · US
General
McIntire et al. v. Wm. Penn Broadcasting Co.
327 U.S. 779·Supreme Court of the United States·1946
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 722.
McIntire et al. v. Wm. Penn Broadcasting Co.
February 11, 1946.
Weidner Titzck and William S. Bennet for petitioners. Wm. Clarke Mason, A. Allen Woodruff, Thomas B. K. Binge, W. Theodore Pierson and F. Cleveland Hedrick, Jr. for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit denied.