General
UNITED STATES v. WM. J. MATHESON & CO., Limited
106 F. 991·United States Circuit Court for the Southern District of New York·1900
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
UNITED STATES v. WM. J. MATHESON & CO., Limited.
(Circuit Court, S. D. New York.
December 21, 1900.)
No. 3,124.
Appeal by the United States from a decision of the Board of United States General Appraisers.
Charles D. Baker, Asst. U. S. Atty.
Albert Comstock, for importer.
[MAJORITY — TOWNSEND, District Judge.]
TOWNSEND, District Judge.
The issues herein are the same as those in Matheson v. U. S. (C. C.) 90 Fed. 276, and Id., 99 Fed. 430. The board of general appraisers has found that’the merchandise herein is the same as that discussed in said opinion. The facts in said cases having been proven to the satisfaction of the court, and there being no new facts proven herein which would justify a different conclusion, the court is bound by said former decisions, and the decision of the board of general appraisers is affirmed. From the said affirmance should be excepted 12 certain entries as to which the protests were not seasonably filed. As to these entries the decision of the board of general appraisers is reversed.
End of Cases in Yol. 106.