Criminal Law · MBE-tested
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GEORGE WARNER, Appellant
34 Cal. App. 804·District Court of Appeal of the State of California·1917·CA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
[Crim. No. 399.
Third Appellate District.
October 8, 1917.]
THE PEOPLE, Respondent, v. GEORGE WARNER, Appellant.
Criminal Law—Grand Jury—Competency of Women.—Judgment and order denying new trial reversed on the authority of People v. Bensen, ante, p. 336.
APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Modoc County, and from an order denying a new trial. Clarence A. Raker, Judge.
The facts in this case are identical with those in People v. Lensen, ante, p. 336.
Jamison & Wylie, for Appellant.
U. S. Webb, Attorney-General, and J. Chas. Jones, Deputy Attorney-General, for Respondent.
[MAJORITY — BURNETT, J.]
BURNETT, J.
This case is identical in its facts with the case of People v. Lensen, ante, p. 336, [167 Pac. 406], recently decided by this court, and the same points are made upon this appeal for a reversal of the judgment and order denying defendant’s motion for a new trial. An extended opinion, therefore, becomes unnecessary. Upon the authority of the Lensen case the judgment and order are reversed.
Chipman, P. J., and Hart, J., concurred.