Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York ex rel. John D. Elwell, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Chess Club, Respondent, 1900 — 164 N.Y. 605 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York ex rel. John D. Elwell, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Chess Club, Respondent
164 N.Y. 605·New York Court of Appeals·1900·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York ex rel. John D. Elwell, Appellant, v. The Manhattan Chess Club, Respondent.
People ex rel. Elwell v. Manh. Ohess Olub, 34 App. Div. 631, affirmed.
(Argued November 2, 1900;
decided November 16, 1900.)
Appeal from a judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 9, 1898, affirming a judgment dismissing an alternative writ of mandanus directing the defendant to reinstate the relator as a member of the Manhattan Chess Club or to show cause to the contrary, entered upon a decision of the court at a Trial Term without a jury.
Conwa/y do Westbrook for appellant.
Posooe H. Channing for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Judgment affirmed, with costs'; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., Gray, O’Brien, Haight, Landon, Cullen and Werner, JJ.