General

In the Matter of the Application of Hortense Danaher, Respondent, for a Peremptory or Alternative Order of Mandamus against Rev. William A. Courtney, as President, and Others, as Members of and Constituting the Board of Child Welfare of the City of New York, Appellants

235 A.D. 774·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1932·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

In the Matter of the Application of Hortense Danaher, Respondent, for a Peremptory or Alternative Order of Mandamus against Rev. William A. Courtney, as President, and Others, as Members of and Constituting the Board of Child Welfare of the City of New York, Appellants. [MAJORITY] Order affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. No opinion. Present — Finch, P. J., McAvoy, Martin, O’Malley and Townley, JJ.