General
Siragan S. Costikyan, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant
128 N.Y. 633·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Siragan S. Costikyan, as Administrator, etc., Respondent, v. The Rome, Watertown and Ogdensburg Railroad Company, Appellant.
(Submitted June 17, 1891;
decided October 6, 1891.)
Appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the fifth judicial department, entered upon an order made January 23, 1891, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon a verdict and affirmed an order denying a motion for a new trial.
Edmund B. Wynn for appellant.
Abram & Niles C. Bartholomew for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.