Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
New York ex rel. Prisament v. Brophy, Warden, 1942 — 317 U.S. 625 · caselaw · US
General
New York ex rel. Prisament v. Brophy, Warden
317 U.S. 625·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 323.
New York ex rel. Prisament v. Brophy, Warden.
October 12, 1942.
Martin Prisament, pro se.
[MAJORITY]
The motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis is granted. The petition for writ of certiorari to the County Court of Cayuga County, New York, is denied. The application for certiorari to the District Court of the United States for the Middle District of Georgia is also denied.