Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John S. Baird ,et al., as Trastees under the Will of John Baird, Deceased, Respondents, v. Mary A. Campbell, Appellant, Impleaded with Others; John S. Baird et al., as Trustees under the Will of John Baird, Deceased, Respondents, v. Kate F. Allen, Appellant, Impleaded with Others, 1903 — 177 N.Y. 539 · caselaw · US
General
John S. Baird ,et al., as Trastees under the Will of John Baird, Deceased, Respondents, v. Mary A. Campbell, Appellant, Impleaded with Others; John S. Baird et al., as Trustees under the Will of John Baird, Deceased, Respondents, v. Kate F. Allen, Appellant, Impleaded with Others
177 N.Y. 539·New York Court of Appeals·1903·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
John S. Baird ,et al., as Trastees under the Will of John Baird, Deceased, Respondents, v. Mary A. Campbell, Appellant, Impleaded with Others. John S. Baird et al., as Trustees under the Will of John Baird, Deceased, Respondents, v. Kate F. Allen, Appellant, Impleaded with Others.
Baird v. Campbell, 67 App. Div. 104; Baird v. Allen, 67 App. Div. 615, affirmed.
(Argued December 7, 1903;
decided December 18, 1903.)
Appeals from judgments of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered December 24, 1901, affirming judgments in favor of plaintiffs entered upon verdicts and orders denying motions for new trials.
John O. Shaw for appellants.
William B. Wilder and John JEwen for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Judgments affirmed, with costs ; no opinion.
Concur: Pabiceb, Oh. J., Geay, O’Bbien, Babtlett, Mabtin and Cullen, JJ. Absent: Haight, J.