Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Hays v. Anderson et al., 1959 — 361 U.S. 838 · caselaw · US
General
Hays v. Anderson et al.
361 U.S. 838·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 115.
Hays v. Anderson et al.
Warner W. Gardner, Alfred L. Scanlan, Samuel I. Sherwood and George Schwartz for petitioner. Solicitor General Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Dóub and Samuel D. Slade for respondents. Edward. L. Merrigan for the American Federation of Government' Employees, in support of petitioner.
[MAJORITY]
Motion of American Federation of Government Employees for leave to file brief; as amicus curiae, granted. Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia'Circuit denied.