Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Frank EDWARDS v. F. G. ZERBST, Warden of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas, 1932 — 59 F.2d 1058 · caselaw · US
General
Frank EDWARDS v. F. G. ZERBST, Warden of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas
59 F.2d 1058·United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit·1932
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Frank EDWARDS v. F. G. ZERBST, Warden of the United States Penitentiary at Leavenworth, Kansas.
No. 684.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit
May 13, 1932.
Alfred Holman, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for appellant. .
Dan B. Cowie, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Topeka, Kan., for appellee.
Before LEWIS and PHILLIPS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Appeal dismissed for want of merit.