Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Leonora S. Gray, Respondent, v. William T. Baker et al., Appellants, 1893 — 140 N.Y. 636 · caselaw · US
General
Leonora S. Gray, Respondent, v. William T. Baker et al., Appellants
140 N.Y. 636·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Leonora S. Gray, Respondent, v. William T. Baker et al., Appellants.
(Submitted November 27, 1893;
decided December 12, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, made May 8, 1893, which affirmed an order of Special Term vacating an order for the examination of plaintiffs before trial.
JTemry F. <& James Coupe for appellants.
Ramil J. Newla/nd for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.