Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
McMullans et al. v. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc., et al., 1956 — 351 U.S. 918 · caselaw · US
General
McMullans et al. v. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc., et al.
351 U.S. 918·Supreme Court of the United States·1956
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 759.
McMullans et al. v. Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc., et al.
C. A. Summers for petitioners. R. M. Mountcastle for the Kansas, Oklahoma & Gulf Railway Co., Inc., and Harold R. Shoemake and Harold C. Heiss for Local No. 488, Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen & Enginemen, et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 10th Cir. Certio-rari denied.