Contracts · MBE-tested
Textile Workers Union of America v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. et al.; and National Labor Relations Board v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. et al.
377 U.S. 903·Supreme Court of the United States·1964
Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 846.
No. 874.
Textile Workers Union of America v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. et al.; and National Labor Relations Board v. Darlington Manufacturing Co. et al.
Patricia Eames for petitioner in No. 846.
Solicitor General Cox, Arnold Ordman, Dominick L. Manoli, Norton J. Come and Nancy M. Sherman for the National Labor Relations Board, respondent in No. 846 and petitioner in No. 874.
Thornton H. Brooks for Darlington Manufacturing Co., and Stuart N. Updike, John R. Schoemer, Jr., John Lord O’Brian and Hugh B. Cox for Deering Milli-ken, Inc., respondents in both cases.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari granted. The cases are consolidated and a total of two hours is allotted for oral argument.
Mr. Justice Stewart and Mr. Justice Goldberg took no part in the consideration or decision of these petitions.
Reported below: 325 F. 2d 682.