Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al., 1944 — 323 U.S. 701 · caselaw · US
General
Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
323 U.S. 701·Supreme Court of the United States·1944
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 575.
Colorado-Wyoming Gas Co. v. Federal Power Commission et al.
November 13, 1944.
Messrs. Donald C. McCreery, Paul W. Lee, George H. Shaw, and Wm. A. Bryans, III, for petitioner.
Solictor General Fahy, Assistant Attorney General Shea, and Messrs. Paul A. Sweeney, Charles V. Shannon, and Louis J. OMarr, Attorney General of Wyoming, for the Federal Power Commission et al., respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Circuit Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit granted limited to the seventh question presented by the petition for the writ.