General

Richard Reinitz et al., Respondents, v. Arc Electrical Construction Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and George A. Fuller Co. et al., Appellants

80 A.D.2d 932·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1981·NY

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Richard Reinitz et al., Respondents, v Arc Electrical Construction Co., Inc., et al., Defendants, and George A. Fuller Co. et al., Appellants. [MAJORITY] Appeals from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term, entered March 21, 1980 in Albany County, which granted plaintiffs’ motion for leave to serve an amended complaint. Order affirmed, with costs. We note only that on oral argument it was conceded the ad damnum clause in the amended complaint in the action brought by plaintiff Richard Reinitz against defendant County of Albany, is to be limited to $1,500,000, that being the sum sought in the amended notice of claim. Sweeney, J.P., Casey, Yesawich, Jr., Weiss and Herlihy, JJ., concur.