Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Young v. Reuben, 1784 — 1 U.S. 119 · caselaw · US
General
Young v. Reuben
1 U.S. 1191 Dall. 119·Philadelphia County Court of Common Pleas·1784·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
DECEMBER TERM, 1784.
Young v. Reuben.
Award.
An award of a sum of money, due at a prior date, with interest, is void for uncertainty.
Overruled in Wood v. Earl, 5 Rawle 45.
[MAJORITY]
Under a rule of this court, referees reported, “ that the sum of 751. was due the 3d of Ma/rch last, with interest on the same.” The time mentioned was several months before the meeting of the referees; and, on motion, The Court set aside the report for the uncertainty ; as there might have been a sum due on the 3d of March, and nothing due at the time of making the report,
See Barnet v. Gilson, 3 S. & R. 340; Burkholder v. McFerran, Id. 422; Zerger v. Sailor, 6 Binn. 24; White v. Jones, 8 S. & R. 349.