General
United Railroad Operating Crafts et al. v. Wyer, Trustee, et al.
347 U.S. 929·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 472.
United Railroad Operating Crafts et al. v. Wyer, Trustee, et al.
Edward J. Fruchtman and Richard F. Watt for petitioners.
William J. O’Brien for Wyer; Edward R. Brumley for the New York, New Haven & Hartford Railroad Co.; Shad Polier, Millard L. Midonick, Clifford D. O’Brien and Ruth Weyand for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Engineers, and Mr. Polier, Mr. Midonick, Harold C. Heiss and Russell B. Day for the Brotherhood of Locomotive Firemen and Enginemen; and Bernard L. Alderman for the Brotherhood of Railroad Trainmen, respondents.
[MAJORITY]
C. A. 2d Cir. Certiorari denied.
Mr. Justice Reed and Mr. Justice Jackson are of the opinion certiorari should be granted.