Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Mary C. Works, Appellant, v. The City of Lockport, Respondent, 1884 — 97 N.Y. 639 · caselaw · US
General
Mary C. Works, Appellant, v. The City of Lockport, Respondent
97 N.Y. 639·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Mary C. Works, Appellant, v. The City of Lockport, Respondent.
(Submited October 27, 1884;
decided November 25, 1884.)
Ransom & Joyce for appellant.
Benjamin J. Hunting for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm on opinion below.
All concur.
Order affirmed, and judgment absolute ordered against plaintiff.