Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Andrew Gilhooly, Respondent, v. Adolph Tannenbaum, Appellant, 1891 — 129 N.Y. 650 · caselaw · US
General
Andrew Gilhooly, Respondent, v. Adolph Tannenbaum, Appellant
129 N.Y. 650·New York Court of Appeals·1891·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Andrew Gilhooly, Respondent, v. Adolph Tannenbaum, Appellant.
(Argued December 4, 1891;
decided December 22, 1891.)
Motion to dismiss appeal from judgment of the General Term of the Court of Common Pleas in and for the city and county of New York, which affirmed a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon an order sustaining a demurrer to-defendant’s counter-claim.
Adolph Tannenbaum for appellant.
William E. Gilhooly for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to grant motion; no opinion.
All concur.
Appeal dismissed.