Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
John Gund Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Great Northern Railway Company et al., 1918 — 246 U.S. 651 · caselaw · US
General
John Gund Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Great Northern Railway Company et al.
246 U.S. 651·Supreme Court of the United States·1918
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 187.
John Gund Brewing Company, Appellant, v. Great Northern Railway Company et al.
Appeal from the District Court of the United States for the District of Minnesota.
Argued March 13, 1918.
Decided March 18, 1918.
Mr. Frederick W. Zollman, Mr. Levi Cooke, Mr. Louis W. Frankel and Mr. Robert Crain for appellant.
Mr. Assistant Attorney General Warren for appellees.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
Judgment affirmed upon the authority of (1) The Cherokee Tobacco, 11 Wall. 616, 624; Whitney v. Robertson, 124 U. S. 190, 194; Ward v. Race Horse, 163 U. S. 504, 511; (2) United States v. 43 Gallons of Whiskey, 93 U. S. 188. See Perrin v. United States, 232 U. S. 478, 483-485. (3) Johnson v. Gearlds, 234 U. S. 422.