Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
AUTOMATIC WRAPPING MACHINE CO. v. PNEUMATIC SCALE CORPORATION, Inc., 1933 — 65 F.2d 1010 · caselaw · US
Corporations
AUTOMATIC WRAPPING MACHINE CO. v. PNEUMATIC SCALE CORPORATION, Inc.
65 F.2d 1010·United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit·1933
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
AUTOMATIC WRAPPING MACHINE CO. v. PNEUMATIC SCALE CORPORATION, Inc.
NO. 4977.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.
July 27, 1933.
Thomas H. Pisher, of Chicago, 111., for' appellant.
Ellis Spear, Jr., of Washington, D. C., and William 0. Belt, of Chicago, 111., for ap-pellee.
Before ALSCHÜDER, and EVANS, Circuit Judges.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
On motion of counsel for appellant, counsel for appellee consenting, it is ordered, adjudged, and decreed by this court that this appeal be, and the same is hereby, dismissed, with costs.