Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. The Madison Square Bank, Defendant; In the Matter of the Petition of George T. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Receivers of Madison Square Bank, Appellants, 1894 — 142 N.Y. 644 · caselaw · US
General
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. The Madison Square Bank, Defendant; In the Matter of the Petition of George T. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Receivers of Madison Square Bank, Appellants
142 N.Y. 644·New York Court of Appeals·1894·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
The People of the State of New York, Plaintiff, v. The Madison Square Bank, Defendant. In the Matter of the Petition of George T. Fitzgerald, Respondent, v. Receivers of Madison Square Bank, Appellants.
(Argued April 9, 1894;
decided April 24, 1894.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made January 18, 1894, which reversed an order of Special Term directing the receivers of the Madison Square Bank to retain out of funds intended to pay dividends certain moneys, and to pay over the same to the State Trust Company.
Moses Weinmom for appellants.
Lyman W. Bedington for respondent.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm; no opinion.
All concur.
Order affirmed.