General

Sarah Paget et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bridgeport et al.

153 Conn. 715·Connecticut Supreme Court·1966·CT

Brief incoming

Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.

Opinion

Sarah Paget et al. v. Zoning Board of Appeals of the City of Bridgeport et al. King, C. J., Murphy, Alcorn, Shannon and House, Js. Submitted on briefs November 9, 1965 decided January 6, 1966 Albert L. Coles and Daniel D. McDonald, on the brief for the appellants (plaintiffs). Milton H. Belinkie and Alfred R. Belinkie, on the brief for the appellees (defendants Belinkie); with them also on the brief was John J. McCuinness, for the appellee (named defendant). [MAJORITY — Per Curiam.] Per Curiam. The appeal in this case involves the same premises as those in Goldberger v. Zoning Board of Appeals, 153 Conn. 312, 216 A.2d 424. The parties submitted this matter on briefs and stipulated that the decision in the Goldberger ease would be controlling in this one. There is error, the judgment is set aside and the case is remanded with direction to sustain the appeal.