Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Jones versus Little, 1792 — 2 U.S. 182 · caselaw · US
General
Jones versus Little
2 U.S. 1822 Dall. 182·Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·1792·PA
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Jones versus Little.
THE defendant’s counsel produced a certificate from a physician, stating that the defendant had been dangerously ill for three weeks last past; and thereupon moved to put off the trial.
But the Court held this to be no good cause for putting off the trial. And,
[MAJORITY — By Shippen, Justice.]
By Shippen, Justice.
If there had been an affidavit stating, that there were material witnesses, who had not been summoned in consequence of this sickness ; or if the plaintiff himself were a witness, to prove books or the like; that might have weight with the Court; but, as it is, the trial must proceed.