Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Charles G. Stevens et al., as Trastees, etc., Respondents, v. Marietta R. Stevens, Impleaded, etc., Appellant, 1893 — 139 N.Y. 610 · caselaw · US
General
Charles G. Stevens et al., as Trastees, etc., Respondents, v. Marietta R. Stevens, Impleaded, etc., Appellant
139 N.Y. 610·New York Court of Appeals·1893·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Charles G. Stevens et al., as Trastees, etc., Respondents, v. Marietta R. Stevens, Impleaded, etc., Appellant.
(Argued June 20, 1893 ;
decided October 3, 1893.)
Appeal from order of the General Term of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, made May 11, 1893; which reversed' an order of Special Term refusing to continue an injunction.
Melville H. Regemburger for appellant.
George, Zabriskie for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to dismiss appeal; no opinion.
All concur, except Gray, J., not sitting.
Appeal dismissed.