Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Walker et al. v. City of Birmingham, 1967 — 389 U.S. 894 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Walker et al. v. City of Birmingham
389 U.S. 894·Supreme Court of the United States·1967
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and petition.
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 249,
October Term, 1966.
Walker et al. v. City of Birmingham,
Joseph B. Robison for American Jewish Congress; J. M. Breckenridge and Earl McBee for respondent in opposition.
J. Albert Woll, Laurence Gold and Thomas E. Harris for American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations.
[MAJORITY]
388 U. S. 307. Motions of American Jewish Congress and American Federation of Labor & Congress of Industrial Organizations for leave to file briefs, as amici curiae, in support of petition granted. Petition for rehearing denied.
Mr. Justice Marshall took no part in the consideration or decision of these motions and petition.