General
Ziegfeld Follies, Inc., Respondent, v. Gus Hill, Appellant
177 A.D. 881·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1917·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Ziegfeld Follies, Inc., Respondent, v. Gus Hill, Appellant.
Appeal from an order of the Special Term granting an injunction pendente lite.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The order appealed from should be modified so as to restrain the use of the word “Follies” of any particular year, unless the entertainment so designated by the defendant is emphasized by the addition of his name in type and style which will be equally conspicuous with the name of the “Follies,” and as so modified affirmed, without costs. Present — Clarke, P. J., Scott, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion, and as modified affirmed, without costs. Order to be settled on notice.