Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Bentsen et al. v. Blackwell et al., 1954 — 347 U.S. 925 · caselaw · US
Securities
Bentsen et al. v. Blackwell et al.
347 U.S. 92598 L. Ed. 2d 1078·Supreme Court of the United States·1954
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 423.
Bentsen et al. v. Blackwell et al.
Argued March 9, 1954.
Decided March 15, 1954.
Paul A. Porter and Milton V. Freeman argued the cause for petitioners. With them on the brief was Jackson Littleton.
Edward Holland Mcllheran argued the cause for respondents. With him on the brief was Garland F. Smith. By special leave of Court, John F. Davis argued the cause for the Securities and Exchange Commission, as amicus curiae, urging affirmance. With him on the brief were Solicitor General Sobeloff, William H. Timbers, Alexander Cohen and Henry L. Stern.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Per Curiam:
The argument having developed the undesirability of deciding the questions in this case on the pleadings, the writ of certiorari is dismissed.