Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Anna Seidlinger, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company et al., Appellants; Louis Seidlinger, Respondent, v. The Same Appellants, 1884 — 97 N.Y. 642 · caselaw · US
General
Anna Seidlinger, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company et al., Appellants; Louis Seidlinger, Respondent, v. The Same Appellants
97 N.Y. 642·New York Court of Appeals·1884·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Anna Seidlinger, Respondent, v. The Brooklyn City Railroad Company et al., Appellants. Louis Seidlinger, Respondent, v. The Same Appellants.
(Argued October 31, 1884;
decided November 25, 1884.)
Winchester Britton and Charles J. Patterson for appellants.
A. H. Dailey for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Agree to affirm ; no opinion.
All concur.
Judgment affirmed.