General
In the Matter of Kenneth W. McDonald, Petitioner, v. New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents
77 A.D.3d 668908 N.Y.S.2d 367·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·2010·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of Kenneth W. McDonald, Petitioner, v New York State Division of Human Rights et al., Respondents.
[908 NYS2d 367]
[MAJORITY]
Proceeding pursuant to Executive Law § 298 to review a determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights dated December 12, 2008, which adopted the recommendation and findings of an administrative law judge dated October 27, 2008, made after a hearing, finding that the petitioner did not establish that the respondent North Ferry Co., Inc., discriminated against him based upon his age, and dismissed the administrative complaint.
Adjudged that the determination is confirmed, the petition is denied, and the proceeding is dismissed on the merits, with costs.
The determination of the Commissioner of the New York State Division of Human Rights that the respondent North Ferry Co., Inc. (hereinafter the respondent), did not discriminate against the petitioner on the basis of his age when it changed his employment status from “part-time” to “casual” is supported by substantial evidence (see Matter of Sauer v Donaldson, 49 AD3d 656 [2008]; Stephenson v Hotel Empls. & Rest. Empls. Union Local 100 of AFL-CIO, 6 NY3d 265, 271 [2006]). The respondent provided a nondiscriminatory reason for taking the action in question, and the petitioner failed to show that the reason was a pretext for discrimination (see Matter of Sauer v Donaldson, 49 AD3d at 657; Rainer N. Mittl, Ophthalmologist, P.C. v New York State Div. of Human Rights, 100 NY2d 326, 330 [2003]). Santucci, J.P., Balkin, Belen and Chambers, JJ., concur.