Administrative
United China & Glass Co. v. United States
51 Cust. Ct. 254·United States Customs Court·1963
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Before the Third Division,
November 14, 1963
No. 68107.
United China & Glass Co. v. United States,
protests 63/11993, 63/11995, and 63/12004 (Baltimore).
[MAJORITY — Donlon, J.]
Opinion by
Donlon, J.
In accordance with stipulation of counsel that the merchandise consists of decorated porcelain after-dinner cups and saucers the same in all material respects as those the subject of United States v. The Balti more & Ohio R.R. Co. a/c United, China & Glass Company (47 CCPA 1, C.A.D. 719), the merchandise was held dutiable as follows: (a) The items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption prior to September 10, 1956, at 50 cents per dozen, but not less than 45 percent nor more than 70 percent ad valorem, under paragraph 212, as modified by the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 51802), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 51909), and (b) all items entered, or withdrawn from warehouse, for consumption on and after September 10, 1955, at 45 percent under said paragraph, as modified by the Japanese Protocol to the General Agreement on Tariffs and Trade (T.D. 53865), supplemented by Presidential proclamation (T.D. 53877).