Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gracie v. Maryland Insurance Company, 1814 — 12 U.S. 84 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Gracie v. Maryland Insurance Company
12 U.S. 848 Cranch 84·Supreme Court of the United States·1814
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Gracie v. Maryland Insurance Company.
[MAJORITY — Marshall, Ch. J.]
Marshall, Ch. J.
This case differs from that against the Marine Insurance Company of Baltimore only in one particular. A part of the cargo remained on board the ship, until the arrival of the French troops, when the departure of the vessel was prohibited by the general, and the ransom made. This circumstance does not, in the opinion of the court, vary the case ; because, omitting all other considerations, the loss, within the risk, being on only a part of the cargo, is a partial loss, and is affected by the warranty against particular average loss. This judgment is also to be affirmed, with costs.
Judgment affirmed.