Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Avent v. Mississippi Unemployment Compensation Commission et al., 1942 — 316 U.S. 641 · caselaw · US
General
Avent v. Mississippi Unemployment Compensation Commission et al.
316 U.S. 641·Supreme Court of the United States·1942
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
No. 1067.
Avent v. Mississippi Unemployment Compensation Commission et al.
April 6, 1942.
Mr. Rufus Creekmore for appellant.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam:]
Appeal from the Supreme Court of Mississippi.
Per Curiam:
The appeal is dismissed for want of a substantial federal question. Carmichael v. Southern Coal Co., 301 U. S. 495, 510-13; Great A. & P. Co. v. Grosjean, 301 U. S. 412; H. E. Butt Grocery Co. v. Sheppard, 311 U. S. 608; Helvering v. Clifford, 309 U. S. 331.