General
Anthony Komar, Respondent, v. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A. Greene Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent
284 A.D. 804·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1954·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
(July 22, 1954.)
(Republished.)
Anthony Komar, Respondent, v. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Appellants, et al., Defendant. Dun & Bradstreet Co., Inc., et al., Third-Party Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. A. Greene Co., Inc., Third-Party Defendant-Respondent.
[MAJORITY]
‘Judgment modified by reversing that part thereof which grants judgment in favor of plaintiff against defendants, with costs, and the complaint dismissed, with costs and, as so modified, affirmed. Present — Dore, J. P., Callahan, Breitel, Bastow and Botein, JJ. Opinion by Callahan, J. Breitel and Bastow, JJ., dissent and vote to reverse and order a new trial unless plaintiff stipulates to reduce the verdict to $60,000 in which event the judgment, as so modified, is affirmed; dissenting opinion by Bastow, J. Order filed.
[Also printed ante, p. 538.— Rep.]