Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Joshua Mather, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant and Respondent. Ida F. Lovelace and Nicholas Pendergast, as Administrators, Respondents and Appellants. Maud Mather McChesney et al., Respondents, 1904 — 179 N.Y. 526 · caselaw · US
Tax
In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Joshua Mather, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant and Respondent. Ida F. Lovelace and Nicholas Pendergast, as Administrators, Respondents and Appellants. Maud Mather McChesney et al., Respondents
179 N.Y. 526·New York Court of Appeals·1904·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Appraisal, under the Transfer Tax Act, of the Estate of Joshua Mather, Deceased. The Comptroller of the State of New York, Appellant and Respondent. Ida F. Lovelace and Nicholas Pendergast, as Administrators, Respondents and Appellants. Maud Mather McChesney et al., Respondents.
Matter of Mather, 90 App. Div. 382, affirmed.
(Argued June 2, 1904;
decided June 17, 1904.)
Cross-appeals from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, entered January 19, 1904, which affirmed an order of the Oneida County Surrogate’s Court assessing a transfer tax upon the estate of Joshua Mather, deceased.
Albert T. Wilkinson and Russel 8. Johnson for comptroller, appellant and respondent.
Smith M. Lindsley and William 8. Mackie for administrators, respondents and appellants.
Josiah Perry for respondents.
[MAJORITY]
Order affirmed, without costs; no opinion.
Concur: Parker, Ch. J., O’Brien, Bartlett, Martin, Vann, Cullen and Werner, JJ.