Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. William J. HYNES, 1931 — 49 F.2d 1074 · caselaw · US
Tax
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. William J. HYNES
49 F.2d 1074·United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit·1931
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
David BURNET, Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Petitioner, v. William J. HYNES.
No. 8852.
Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.
March 3, 1931.
G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and S. Suydam, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for petitioner.
Edward P. Smith and Prank E. Sheehan, both of Omaha, Neb., for respondent.
[MAJORITY — PER CURIAM.]
PER CURIAM.
Petition to review decision of United States Board of Tax Appeals dismissed without costs to either party in this court, on motion of petitioner.