Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
De SIMONE v. UNITED STATES, 1959 — 361 U.S. 125 · caselaw · US
General
De SIMONE v. UNITED STATES
361 U.S. 1254 L. Ed. 2d 167·Supreme Court of the United States·1959
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
De SIMONE v. UNITED STATES.
No. 202.
Decided December 7, 1959.
Joseph K. Hertogs for petitioner.
Solicitor General- Rankin, Assistant Attorney General Wilkey and Beatrice Rosenberg for the United States.
[MAJORITY — Per Curiam.]
Per Curiam.
The petition for writ of certiorari is granted. It appears from the Government’s suggestion of mootness and the memoranda filed in connection therewith that the petitioner is no longer in custody of the warden to whom the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum was directed, and that the Government will take no further action under any order pursuant to which petitioner might be held in contempt. Accordingly, the judgment of the Court of Appeals; the order of the District Court, issued May 29, 1959, directing the petitioner to appear before the grand jury; the order to show cause issued by the District Court on May 19, 1959; and the order of the District Court, entered April 3, 1959, denying the petitioner’s motion to quash the writ of habeas corpus ad testificandum, and directing him to appear before the grand jury oh April 9, 1959, are vacated. The cause is remanded to the District Court with instructions to dismiss the proceeding as moot.