General
In the Matter of the Application of James A. Greene and Timothy F. Driscoll, Respondents, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against John J. Dorman, as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York, Appellant
229 A.D. 743·New York Supreme Court, Appellate Division·1930·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
In the Matter of the Application of James A. Greene and Timothy F. Driscoll, Respondents, for a Peremptory Mandamus Order against John J. Dorman, as Fire Commissioner of the City of New York, Appellant.
[MAJORITY]
Order, in so far as it grants alternative mandamus order, reversed upon the law, with ten dollars costs and disbursements, and motion for alternative mandamus order denied, with ten dollars costs. The petitioners’ remedy was by an appeal to the board of standards and appeals under section 719 of the Greater New York Charter. Lazansky, P. J., Rich, Young, Kapper and Tompkins, JJ., concur.