Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Augusta G. Genet, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant, 1899 — 159 N.Y. 563 · caselaw · US
General
Augusta G. Genet, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant
159 N.Y. 563·New York Court of Appeals·1899·NY
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
Augusta G. Genet, Respondent, v. The President, Managers and Company of the Delaware and Hudson Canal Company, Appellant.
Reported below, 14 App. Div. 177.
(Argued June 5, 1899;
decided June 13, 1899.)
Motion to dismiss an appeal from an order and judgment of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the first judicial department, entered February 11, 1897, affirming a judgment in favor of plaintiff entered upon the report of k referee.
The grounds of the motion were that the Court of Appeals has no jurisdiction; that there has been irregularity in the practice; that the appeal was premature and that the defendants have waived their right to appeal.
George C. Genet for motion.
Franh F. Smith opposed.
[MAJORITY]
Motion denied, with ten dollars costs.