Study aid, not legal advice. caselaw is not a law firm and does not provide legal advice or engage in the unauthorized practice of law (UPL). All briefs, outlines, and citation tools on these pages are educational summaries for law students; they are not a substitute for advice from a licensed attorney admitted in your jurisdiction. Bar-admission rules vary by state. For court filings or client matters, verify every authority against the official reporter and your court's local rules. Use of caselaw does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Gonzales v. Coughenour, 1975 — 421 U.S. 922 · caselaw · US
Contracts · MBE-tested
Gonzales v. Coughenour
421 U.S. 922·United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania·1975
Brief incoming
Hand-reviewed Bluebook brief (procedural posture, facts, issue, holding, reasoning, dissent) ships once the AI generation pipeline runs through this case. Join the waitlist to get notified when 1L briefs go live.
Opinion
April 21, 1975
No. 74-1078.
Gonzales v. Coughenour.
Mr. Justice Douglas took no part in the consideration or decision of cases in which orders hereinafter reported were announced on this date, with the exception of the following:
No. 74587, Bowen v. United States, infra, p. 929; No. 74588, School Town of Speedway v. United States, infra, p. 929; No. 74-605, Board of School Comm’rs v. United States, infra, p. 929; No. 74806, Keen v. United States, infra, p. 929; No, 74857, Bucolo v. Florida, infra, p. 927; No. 74873, Phillips v. Graf Electric, Inc., infra, p. 929; No. 74876, Draganescu v. First National Bank of Hollywood, infra, p. 929; No. 74877, Harden v. Parks, infra, p. 926; No. 74963, First National Bank of Fayetteville v. Smith, infra, p. 930; No. 74965, Warner Co. v. United States, infra, p. 930; No. 74976, Dunham v. United States, infra, p. 930; No. 74982, Hearst Corp. v. Los Angeles Newspaper Guild, infra, p. 930; No. 74988, McCord v. United States, infra, p. 930; No. 74 992, Seaver v. Wiegand, infra, p. 924; No. 741070, Rey v. Texas, infra, p. 926; No. 741078, Gonzales v. Coughenour, infra, this page; No. 741086, Los Angeles Newspaper Guild v. Hearst Corp., infra, p. 930.
[MAJORITY]
Affirmed on appeal from D. C. N. M.